You Can Look in the Mirror, but Don’t Mistake the Mirror for the Person
Recorded in Chinese
I use BaZi, Human Design, and CliftonStrengths as points of reference for thinking about learning, creativity, and self-worth. They help me name feelings, without proving the explanations are scientific or defining who I am.
00:01 About Bazi—
00:02 Chinese fortune-telling—
00:06 I don't actually know much about it.
00:09 But since it can be seen as
00:11 a tool for understanding yourself,
00:15 I do try to learn about it.
00:18 I just remember that as a child,
00:20 my grandma told me
00:23 that not long after I was born—or
00:26 at least before I could remember—
00:30 she had a spirit medium read my fortune.
00:36 Later, whenever I asked her
00:38 what the fortune-teller had said,
00:41 she never—
00:42 she'd just tell me she couldn't remember.
00:45 She was already quite old at the time,
00:48 so whenever I asked,
00:50 she said she'd forgotten.
00:52 But I also—
00:54 I've honestly never asked
00:56 my parents if they had my fortune read.
01:01 But one thing I know for sure is that
01:04 as I grew up,
01:05 even after I started school,
01:07 everyone in my family—
01:10 apart from my parents and siblings—
01:15 all called me
01:20 by a different name.
01:22 It wasn't my registered name.
01:25 My registered name was
01:27 the one I used at school.
01:29 But whenever I went home,
01:31 everyone used this other name.
01:32 I found it so strange.
01:34 And then,
01:36 I forget who told me this,
01:39 but my registered name
01:41 was chosen by my dad.
01:44 Because—
01:45 apparently, I lacked the metal element,
01:50 so he put a character
01:52 with the metal radical in my name.
01:54 As for my original name,
01:59 um...
02:01 it followed my sister's generation.
02:04 We shared the same middle character.
02:07 But why did my dad change it?
02:09 I think it was because
02:11 he'd consulted a spirit medium,
02:13 who said I lacked metal,
02:14 so I needed a new name.
02:18 And my original name
02:21 was chosen by my grandpa.
02:25 Anyway, it was pretty old-fashioned.
02:29 So, about Bazi fortune-telling—
02:33 how should I put this?
02:36 I've always been trying to understand
02:38 what kind of person I really am.
02:43 And I've noticed that
02:45 after learning about something,
02:49 I'll compare it with my own experience
02:52 to see whether it rings true.
02:54 If it does,
02:55 I'll think, "Hmm, that's interesting."
02:58 But if it doesn't fit, I just think,
03:00 "Okay, that's all there is to it."
03:02 So I've explored many different tools
03:06 that help people understand themselves,
03:10 like Human Design,
03:12 CliftonStrengths,
03:14 Bazi,
03:17 and so on.
03:20 The one I trust most is CliftonStrengths.
03:24 How to put it?
03:25 CliftonStrengths—
03:27 I don't know why
03:28 it seems so scientific to me.
03:31 But the results I got
03:34 really did match me quite well.
03:39 Okay.
03:41 Back to Bazi.
03:44 Bazi is...
03:47 Let me think how to explain it.
03:54 It seems...
03:56 I don't really know how to explain it.
03:58 I honestly don't know much about it.
04:02 I'll talk about it alongside Human Design.
04:07 They might analyze
04:11 how I come to know things,
04:14 how I experience them,
04:17 and how I understand them.
04:21 For example,
04:22 I've long had this intuition,
04:26 or understanding of myself:
04:29 I can't
04:32 imagine things I've never seen.
04:35 For example,
04:36 when I was little,
04:39 everyone would draw, right?
04:41 Our primary school had no art teacher,
04:44 so we simply drew on our own.
04:47 But I found something strange:
04:50 whenever we wanted to draw something,
04:53 I simply couldn't do it.
04:55 But my classmates,
04:57 my friends,
04:58 could draw really well. So then,
05:03 I'd watch how they drew,
05:06 then imitate them to draw the same thing.
05:10 I knew my drawings were ugly,
05:13 but I had still managed to draw something.
05:17 So this whole process really...
05:22 "bothered me" isn't quite right.
05:24 It simply left me with this impression:
05:28 I had no imagination when it came to art.
05:31 I had no idea how to draw anything.
05:34 If I hadn't
05:36 seen how someone else drew it,
05:37 I wouldn't know how to draw it myself.
05:41 There are similar sentences—
05:44 no, similar examples.
05:46 Say we were solving a math problem.
05:51 If I'd never seen
05:52 how that type of problem was solved,
05:54 I couldn't solve it.
05:56 If you simply gave me a formula,
06:01 I couldn't apply it.
06:03 I needed to see someone solve the problem,
06:06 including every step they wrote down.
06:09 Once I saw the whole bundle—
06:12 the full sequence of reasoning—
06:14 then I knew
06:15 how to solve similar problems.
06:19 Another example is,
06:22 say I was entering
06:25 a field I knew nothing about,
06:28 or discussing a subject with someone
06:31 that I knew nothing about.
06:35 If I truly knew nothing
06:37 about that field,
06:39 I couldn't anticipate
06:42 what I might encounter in it.
06:44 Nor could I anticipate
06:45 what I should do when I encountered
06:48 certain contexts within it—
06:49 how I should behave
06:51 or respond.
06:56 If I really had to give an answer,
06:59 I'd search through all my experiences
07:03 and find the closest match.
07:08 A classic example is
07:11 a test I saw on social media
07:14 related to the subconscious.
07:18 It gave you several keywords,
07:20 then
07:21 asked you to form a sentence in your mind
07:24 and say the first sentence
07:26 that came to you.
07:27 The other person would use it
07:29 to infer—or construct—some meaning
07:35 about what your current state
07:37 might be like.
07:39 So how did I approach
07:41 this kind of test?
07:44 First, I would think of
07:46 the scene closest to those keywords,
07:50 then think about what things
07:52 had appeared in that scene.
07:55 If nothing similar
07:56 had appeared in it,
07:59 I'd use the keyword to find
08:02 the thing most closely associated with it.
08:06 That was the process
08:08 that produced my sentence.
08:12 Later, I asked AI why
08:14 my thought pattern worked this way.
08:18 That's when I learned
08:20 that for people like me,
08:24 my ideas
08:27 and thoughts
08:29 are based on things in the physical world,
08:34 on things
08:35 I can actually see.
08:37 I think it meant being driven by concrete things.
08:44 I forget if that was the exact term.
08:48 It means I simply
08:50 can't imagine something that isn't there.
08:55 This reminds me of something
08:58 someone once said—I forget who.
09:01 They said innovation isn't actually
09:06 something created from nothing.
09:08 It's a series of new combinations.
09:13 If you can take things
09:16 that are completely unrelated,
09:20 combine them into something useful,
09:26 or a tool that solves certain problems,
09:31 then creating that tool is innovation.
09:34 It's an invention.
09:37 That includes phones, computers, and TVs.
09:46 Strictly speaking,
09:47 they didn't
09:51 come from nowhere.
09:52 Their predecessors
09:53 must have had predecessors in
09:56 something tangible that already existed.
09:58 That tangible thing made you
10:00 imagine what else it could become.
10:05 Take our shoes, for instance.
10:08 What might they have looked like
10:10 in the earliest times?
10:13 I mean...
10:15 I think
10:16 everything that exists today,
10:19 if traced back to its origin,
10:21 must have had an original spark.
10:27 That's more or less
10:29 my new understanding of innovation.
10:33 I used to think innovation
10:35 meant creating something nonexistent.
10:38 But after encountering ideas like this...
10:43 I think I was reading a book at the time.
10:48 After reading it,
10:50 I realized, wow—
10:51 innovation isn't far removed from us.
10:54 It's actually very close at hand.
10:57 What matters is
10:59 whether we've seen enough things,
11:02 whether we can recognize patterns,
11:05 make associations, imagine,
11:09 and build on what we know—
11:11 whether we can take familiar things
11:15 and connect them
11:17 in counterintuitive ways,
11:19 then create something
11:21 that truly meets an existing need.
11:26 That's an incredibly powerful ability.
11:32 Now I've lost my thread.
11:33 I've lost my train of thought again.
11:36 I don't remember
11:38 what I was talking about earlier.
11:41 Let me think.
11:43 This episode—
11:47 where did this recording even begin?
11:52 Ah...
11:55 This is awkward. I truly can't remember.
12:01 What did I start with?
12:05 I talked about a book,
12:10 and then...
12:15 Bazi! Right.
12:16 Yes, yes, yes.
12:17 I started by talking about Bazi,
12:19 then about self-understanding,
12:21 and some of my past experiences,
12:28 then what they brought to mind.
12:31 Okay, let's go back to
12:34 tools for understanding yourself.
12:38 Some tools might say I'm...
12:45 Wait...
12:46 Oh, right.
12:47 I just gave all those examples.
12:50 They show that
12:51 I'm driven by concrete things.
12:55 I can't imagine images
12:57 that have never appeared in my mind.
13:00 And in my Bazi chart—
13:03 was it my Bazi chart?
13:04 Or was it my Human Design chart?
13:06 Anyway, one of those
13:08 self-understanding tools
13:10 mentioned that...
13:15 Hmm.
13:16 Let's take my Human Design chart.
13:21 My Head and Ajna Centers
13:24 are both completely undefined.
13:26 That means...
13:28 what does it mean?
13:33 It means I'm a very flexible vessel.
13:38 I can take in many different things,
13:42 transform them,
13:44 and give them an explanation.
13:48 But where did that term come from?
13:54 Or where is it validated?
14:00 I don't know.
14:04 This is honestly hilarious.
14:05 I wanted to find evidence
14:07 that validated these traits,
14:10 but I couldn't find any.
14:14 Oh well.
14:15 But CliftonStrengths is very accurate.
14:19 For example, it lists Learner and Input,
14:23 as well as...
14:27 what else?
14:29 Deliberative, Maximizer, Adaptability, Strategic...
14:38 What were the others?
14:43 There are ten in total.
14:45 I don't remember.
14:46 The ones I just mentioned
14:48 are all among my top ten themes.
14:50 And I've found
14:51 that I truly am good at these things.
14:55 But these strengths—
15:00 although I may have great potential,
15:03 but so far,
15:04 in my life,
15:06 I haven't put them to very good use.
15:10 It feels as though
15:11 I've spent my first twenty-odd years
15:15 simply accumulating things, without yet
15:20 developing a strong ability to structure what I've accumulated.
15:23 So everything I've absorbed,
15:25 or all the knowledge I've stored away,
15:28 still exists only in my mind.
15:31 I haven't transformed it into
15:35 something visible that others can see.
15:39 So sometimes I feel
15:41 that I genuinely know a great deal,
15:43 but I have no proof
15:47 that I can show someone and say,
15:49 "I really am good at this.
15:50 Please give me this kind of chance."
15:53 But I do know
15:56 that some of my abilities are very weak,
15:58 such as commercializing things,
16:01 or my...
16:05 I mean...
16:08 My CliftonStrengths report suggests
16:13 that in Relationship Building—
16:18 Harmony...
16:22 Is Harmony in Relationship Building?
16:26 I forget.
16:28 Anyway, my talents related to
16:30 relationships rank near the bottom.
16:35 I'm not good at maintaining relationships.
16:42 Oh, something just occurred to me.
16:44 Speaking of relationships,
16:45 there's an interpretation
16:49 of my Bazi chart that says
16:53 my benefactors—
16:55 or my network
16:56 and resources—
16:57 will appear through work
17:00 and social situations.
17:03 That means if I hide myself
17:06 and don't let anyone see me,
17:08 I won't be able to meet those benefactors.
17:13 This is genuinely
17:14 a major obstacle for me right now.
17:17 I feel I have something to offer,
17:21 but I have no way to prove it.
17:24 So a lot of the time,
17:27 I feel like I have no value.
17:32 Yet deep down, I have
17:35 this powerful conviction that I am extremely valuable.
17:38 That conviction has no clear source.
17:41 You have no idea
17:43 how it came into being,
17:44 but you know it's there.
17:47 It has always been there.
17:49 All my life,
17:50 I've carried this feeling inside me.
17:54 But my reality
17:56 has never made me feel that way.
18:03 This reminds me of a Korean work
18:05 I marked on Douban a few days ago.
18:10 I think it came out this year.
18:13 It was...
18:16 I forget the exact title.
18:18 It was roughly about
18:19 spending your life fighting worthlessness.
18:24 Oh my.
18:25 When I saw the title,
18:28 I practically jumped out of my seat.
18:31 It felt so true.
18:34 For my first twenty-odd years, I've fought
18:39 against the idea that I have no value.
18:43 On one hand,
18:44 some part of my body tells me
18:48 that I do have value.
18:50 But another part of me
18:54 tells me that I don't.
18:57 These two forces are constantly clashing,
19:00 colliding.
19:02 And this conflict
19:04 also appears in my Bazi chart.
19:08 So I thought, wow,
19:10 this is fascinating.
19:13 Perhaps one interpretation prompts me
19:16 to examine the struggles I'm going through
19:19 and the things I've experienced.
19:22 Before I had
19:24 these tools for self-understanding,
19:26 I didn't realize
19:28 that this was a struggle I had,
19:31 that I was going through this.
19:33 Their very presence
19:35 made me search through my experiences
19:38 and examine my feelings.
19:41 That allowed me to name
19:43 my experiences and feelings.
19:45 I don't know
19:46 whether those labels are scientific,
19:49 but at least I know
19:50 that in using these systems,
19:52 I've always treated them as references,
19:55 as tools,
19:57 rather than as my identity.
20:01 When I was learning
20:04 to use these tools
20:07 to understand myself,
20:08 I was actually doing it through AI.
20:13 And AI gave me a very...
20:18 how should I put it?
20:20 Something it said that I found very helpful.
20:27 It made this point:
20:29 it said...
20:32 This is awkward.
20:35 What were the exact words?
20:40 It was something like,
20:42 when you use something like this,
20:45 you can treat it as a tool,
20:50 as a means to an end,
20:52 but it isn't who you are.
20:57 Ah, the exact words were—
20:59 I think they were:
21:03 "Use it as a means,
21:05 but don't treat its result as the complete, real you."
21:11 This also shows
21:13 that when we encounter
21:14 tools for understanding ourselves,
21:17 we need to consider
21:19 what kind of object they should be to us,
21:22 and how we should approach
21:25 their relationship to who we are.
21:30 That is absolutely crucial.