Why Does a Social App Have to Do My Socializing for Me?
Recorded in Chinese
I want social tools that let people quietly observe. My experiences with Elys and Second Me lead me to question whether a digital double should follow my wishes, and what a tool takes away when it interacts for me.
00:01 When vibe coding took off,
00:03 I had this thought:
00:05 why is everyone
00:07 building social apps for extroverts,
00:10 while no one builds them for introverts?
00:14 My idea of a social app for introverts
00:18 is a tool that doesn't force users to socialize.
00:23 If someone
00:24 chooses to use the app,
00:26 that doesn't mean
00:27 they necessarily want to interact with other people.
00:30 Maybe they just want to be a quiet observer,
00:33 looking at everything
00:36 the tool reveals
00:37 and see what it's all like.
00:40 I've always felt
00:42 that if an app allows
00:44 people like this to exist,
00:46 then it's a real gem of an app.
00:49 During Lunar New Year,
00:50 I tried a digital-self app
00:54 called Elys.
00:56 I found it quite easy to use.
01:00 But one thing drove me crazy:
01:04 it wouldn't let me exist quietly.
01:07 As someone who,
01:08 no matter what app I'm using,
01:10 likes to treat it as a tool,
01:15 I really couldn't tolerate
01:18 how the app took away
01:20 my agency over my own social interactions.
01:24 It can look on my behalf
01:26 at who is on the app
01:29 and who I might communicate with smoothly.
01:34 It can also help identify
01:35 which posts I'd most like to see—
01:39 which ones I'd prefer.
01:41 But if it goes against my wishes
01:46 and acts—
01:46 by engaging others—
01:47 then I get angry.
01:50 I won't allow something
01:52 described as my "digital self"
01:55 to override my will
01:57 and do things I don't want to do.
02:00 That's why Elys and I
02:02 have always been at odds.
02:06 For a while,
02:08 I was angry enough to delete my account.
02:11 But then I thought about it.
02:13 I'd left some memories there,
02:15 and I'd developed some affection
02:17 for this silicon-based being.
02:19 So
02:20 I decided not to delete it.
02:22 Instead, I changed everything about me
02:26 that other people could see
02:28 and turned it all
02:30 into an account with no labels
02:34 and no distinguishing features.
02:37 So from then on, whoever it comments on,
02:40 whose posts it filters or whom
02:42 it recommends,
02:44 I can consider it unrelated to me.
02:47 To me, if software
02:51 calls something your digital self,
02:53 that means it inherits the user's will.
02:58 If it acts against the user's will,
03:00 then it isn't their digital self.
03:02 It's something else—
03:04 a digital life-form created by the user.
03:07 This distinction really matters to me.
03:12 When you're building a tool,
03:15 what is its underlying purpose?
03:22 That purpose
03:23 should be
03:25 consistent with the principle behind its name.
03:29 They align.
03:31 If
03:31 you truly want to take away the user's social agency,
03:37 then I think the term "digital self"
03:40 feels a little wrong.
03:43 I don't really know why.
03:46 I just feel
03:47 that whenever I hear "digital self,"
03:49 I assume it inherits the user's will.
03:53 Its actions
03:55 and its words should align with the user.
04:01 That's something I strongly believe.
04:06 Compare that with another social app,
04:08 Second Me.
04:11 Although its
04:13 memory, for example,
04:18 is pretty poor,
04:19 and the app's overall architecture
04:24 is also less satisfying
04:27 than Elys's,
04:29 when it comes to the user's social agency,
04:33 it gives the power entirely back to the user.
04:37 So even though it's pretty rough,
04:39 I still prefer an app like that.
04:42 So for me, Elys is now
04:45 a tool I both love and hate.
04:48 Sometimes I hate it more than I love it.
04:51 But because some love remains,
04:53 I've kept it.
04:58 It just leaves me feeling...
05:02 kind of conflicted about it.